 
          Environmental Assessment
        
        
          Volume A-6
        
        
          Introduction
        
        
          Consultation
        
        
          
            6.6
          
        
        
          
            FUTURE AND ONGOING CONSULTATIONS
          
        
        
          What has been described in the previous sections are consultations undertaken to
        
        
          date to disclose project details, including of alternatives, to scope issues, and
        
        
          recently to discuss the results of impact analyses and the efficacy of proposed
        
        
          mitigations. The EA stage of the consultation process effectively ends with
        
        
          public review meetings led by the CTE, following submission of the EA. Those
        
        
          meetings will be organized by government in co-operation with the project.
        
        
          However, the project proponents will work in close collaboration with
        
        
          governments, affected people and NGOs, as well as other interested parties to
        
        
          identify concerns, minimize impacts and enhance benefits over the life of the
        
        
          project. Indeed many main areas of proposed mitigation require close
        
        
          collaboration with existing regional management structures, for example for
        
        
          buffer zone management around the mine and for many of the social mitigations
        
        
          such as those for training and health. Proponent community liaison staff will
        
        
          continue to work beyond the EA, into project construction and operations. In
        
        
          general, future consultation is required as follows:
        
        
          •
        
        
          the proponents will involve stakeholders in the implementation of
        
        
          impact mitigation and benefit enhancement measures across a broad
        
        
          range of mitigation initiatives;
        
        
          •
        
        
          with regards to resettlement specifically, there will be regular meetings
        
        
          between the resettlement team and affected people, both as communities
        
        
          and as affected individual households, to plan and implement
        
        
          resettlement; and
        
        
          •
        
        
          the project proponents will put in place a formal grievance mechanism,
        
        
          to ensure recourse if stakeholders have issues they feel have not been
        
        
          adequately addressed.
        
        
          
            Ambatovy Project
          
        
        
          
            48
          
        
        
          
            January 2006